From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.
Jan 24, 2019
31 Cal.App.5th 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. B286350.

01-24-2019

DIONNE LICUDINE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER et al., Defendants and Respondents.


[Modification of opinion (30 Cal.App.5th 918; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on January 3, 2019, be modified as follows:

1. On page 12 [30 Cal.App.5th 927, advance report, 2d full par., line 12], at the top of the page in bullet point (1), after the language "stating that her doctors' negligence was `self-evident,'" add the following:

that Dr. Gupta had "informed the family that he penetrated so far because [plaintiff] was `too skinny ....'"

2. On page 13 [30 Cal.App.5th 927, advance report, last line], the first sentence, after the language "On the question of liability," add the following:

Dr. Gupta may have admitted to holding the instrument that nicked plaintiff's vein but....

3. On page 15 [30 Cal.App.5th 929, advance report, 4th par., line 2], the first full paragraph, first sentence, delete "a general" in front of "objection" and add "an" so that the text reads "an objection ...."

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.
Jan 24, 2019
31 Cal.App.5th 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:DIONNE LICUDINE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Date published: Jan 24, 2019

Citations

31 Cal.App.5th 505 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)