From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Licorish v. Nor-Win Realty Corp.

APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 18, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51890 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

Opinion

570376/06

10-18-2011

Nicola M. Licorish, Executor of Licorish, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nor-Win Realty Corp., Defendant, -and- Edwin R. Taitt, Defendant-Appellant.


PRESENT: , J.P., Shulman, Torres, JJ

Defendant Edwin R. Taitt appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 14, 2009, which denied his motion to amend a prior judgment to reduce the interest award.

Per Curiam.

Order (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 14, 2009, affirmed, without costs.

Defendant-appellant was properly precluded from challenging the method of calculating interest used by the court in its December 13, 2004 order granting plaintiff summary judgment on the underlying complaint. Defendant abandoned this claim when he failed to raise the issue on his direct appeal to this court from the summary judgment order (see Adams Drug Co. v Knobel, 172 AD2d 470 [1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 857 [1991]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Licorish v. Nor-Win Realty Corp.

APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 18, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51890 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
Case details for

Licorish v. Nor-Win Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Nicola M. Licorish, Executor of Licorish, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nor-Win…

Court:APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51890 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)