From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lichtenstein v. Lapadula Villani Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1954
283 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

February 1, 1954.


Order denying appellants' motion to consolidate actions affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Lichtenstein. There was no abuse of discretion by Special Term in denying the motion, in view of the fact that Action No. 1 is on the nonjury calendar and trial is imminent, while considerable time must elapse before Action No. 2, on the jury calendar, can be reached for trial. Under the circumstances presented, consolidation would prejudice a substantial right of the plaintiff in Action No. 1. (Cf. New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency v. Courtlandt Garage Realty Corp., 208 App. Div. 765, and Casanave v. Robbins, 262 App. Div. 873.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Wenzel, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lichtenstein v. Lapadula Villani Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1954
283 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Lichtenstein v. Lapadula Villani Trucking Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN LICHTENSTEIN, Respondent, v. LAPADULA VILLANI TRUCKING CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Richman v. Felmus

( Meyers v. Cowdin, 263 App. Div. 730; Block v. Otis, 260 App. Div. 1047; Weis v. Coe, 265 App. Div. 471. )…

Halpern v. Rodway

In an action pending in Queens County to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract, the appeal is…