From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lichtenstein v. Congregation Bais Yisroel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2007
41 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-03578.

June 5, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the second third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the second third-party complaint.

Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellants.

Mitchell Dranow, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Goldstein, Dillon and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant third-party plaintiff/second third-party plaintiff, Congregation Bais Yisroel (hereinafter the Congregation), as the nonmoving party ( see Ogletree v Rush Realty Assoc., LLC, 29 AD3d 875), the second third-party defendant, Herman Leimzider, failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the second third-party complaint seeking common-law indemnification and contribution ( see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr 64 NY2d 851, 853). Leimzider's failure to make a prim facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law required denial of his motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the Congregation's opposition papers ( id.; see Baillargeon v Kings County Waterproofing Corp., 29 AD3d 838, 839).

Leimzider's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Lichtenstein v. Congregation Bais Yisroel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2007
41 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Lichtenstein v. Congregation Bais Yisroel

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL LICHTENSTEIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONGREGATION BAIS YISROEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 4796
835 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Jaime Alberto Rojas

We reverse. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs ( see Lichtenstein v…