Opinion
(10028)
Argued January 6, 1992
Decision released February 4, 1992
Appeal from a decision by the named defendant, adopting certain amendments to its zoning regulations, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield, where the court, Ballen, J., granted the motion filed by Joel Schiavone et al. to be made defendants; thereafter, the matter was tried to the court, Dean, J.; judgment dismissing the appeal, from which the named plaintiff, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Affirmed.
John J. Luckart, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was John J. Luckart, for the appellant (named plaintiff).
Barbara Brazzel-Massaro, city attorney, for the appellee (named defendant).
David P. Lasnick, for the appellees (intervening defendant Joel Schiavone et al.).
This is an appeal by the named plaintiff, Michael Licamele, from a judgment of the trial court affirming the actions of the defendant zoning commission in adopting an amendment to the Bridgeport zoning regulations. Licamele challenged the amendment on the basis of the alleged participation of a commissioner at a public hearing and executive session after she had disqualified herself from participating in the proceedings because of a potential conflict of interest. See General Statutes 8-11. The trial court found no evidence to support Licamele's allegation that the commissioner had participated in either the public hearing or the executive sessions at which the amendments were adopted.
Our examination of the record in this matter, including the transcript of the testimony before the trial court, persuades us that the trial court's judgment was correct and should be affirmed.