From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-28-2016

LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, P.A., New York (George R. Hardin of counsel), for appellants. Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP, New York (Lance J. Kalik of counsel), for Harleysville Insurance Company of New York, respondent. O'Connor Redd LLP, Port Chester (Joseph M. Cianflone of counsel), for Big Shot Electric Corp., respondent.


Hardin, Kundla, McKeon & Poletto, P.A., New York (George R. Hardin of counsel), for appellants.

Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP, New York (Lance J. Kalik of counsel), for Harleysville Insurance Company of New York, respondent.

O'Connor Redd LLP, Port Chester (Joseph M. Cianflone of counsel), for Big Shot Electric Corp., respondent.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered December 11, 2014, which granted defendant Big Shot Electrical Corp.'s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, and sua sponte dismissed the complaint as against defendant Harleysville Insurance Company of New York and nominal defendant Slawomir Pietrzyk, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the dismissals vacated, and the matter remanded to the Supreme Court.

While we recognize that there are similar issues, and parties with aligned interests, in this and the third party action pending in Supreme Court, Kings County, entitled St. Hilda's & St. Hugh's Sch. & Eurostruct, Inc. v Big Shot Elec. Corp. (Index no. 12254/13), we disagree that this declaratory judgment action should be dismissed outright pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4). This decision is without prejudice to the parties seeking relief in Kings County for a transfer of venue and consolidation and/or to have this action joined with the pending Kings County action. We do not reach the issue or decide the merits of Harleysville's arguments in favor of dismissal since those arguments were not raised before nor considered by the motion court.

SWEENY, J.P., FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
140 A.D.3d 621
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5076

Citing Cases

Minskoff Grant Realty & Mgmt. Corp. v. Breede

, dismissal of this action is required (Silver v Whitney Partners LLC, 130 A.D.3d 512, 514 [1st Dept 2015]).…

Doe v. N.Y. & Presbyterian Hosp.

The Court, pursuant to CPLR §3211[a][4] may "... make such order as justice requires" (Posada v. New York…