reviewing a punitive damages award to determine if the plaintiff presented evidence that permitted a factfinder to conclude, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendants acted with "wanton disregard for the health and safety of others"
Summary of this case from In re J. D. SNo. 94-1337.
May 28, 1996.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 41 F. 3d 429 (first judgment); 42 F. 3d 1398 (second judgment) and 1399 (third judgment).
reviewing a punitive damages award to determine if the plaintiff presented evidence that permitted a factfinder to conclude, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendants acted with "wanton disregard for the health and safety of others"
Summary of this case from In re J. D. SFull title:LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. CHEMSTAR, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 28, 1996
The primary issue on review is the appropriate standard for post-verdict judicial review of a punitive…
Young v. HarperPetitioners sought certiorari on the limited question whether preparole "is more similar to parole or minimum…