From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Director

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 23, 2015
593 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-1549

02-23-2015

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RIFE & HALL COAL COMPANY, Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CAROLYN JUSTUS, o/b/o and widow of Greley Justus, Respondents.

John R. Sigmond, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Bristol, Tennessee, for Petitioners. Joseph E. Wolfe, WOLFE WILLIAMS & REYNOLDS, Norton, Virginia; Sean Gregory Bajkowski, Sarah Marie Hurley, Richard Anthony Seid, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (13-0313-BLA; 13-0314-BLA) Before DUNCAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John R. Sigmond, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Bristol, Tennessee, for Petitioners. Joseph E. Wolfe, WOLFE WILLIAMS & REYNOLDS, Norton, Virginia; Sean Gregory Bajkowski, Sarah Marie Hurley, Richard Anthony Seid, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Rife & Hall Coal Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of living miner benefits to former employee Greley Justus and survivor's benefits to Justus' surviving spouse, Carolyn Justus, under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, Nos. 13-0313-BLA & 13-0314-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Director

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 23, 2015
593 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Director

Case Details

Full title:LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RIFE & HALL COAL COMPANY, Petitioners…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

Citations

593 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2015)