Summary
In Penn v. Garvin, 56 Ark. 513, 20 S.W. 410, the Supreme Court of Arkansas holds that the formality of acknowledgments is designed for the protection of grantors, and that relationship to the grantor on the part of the officer taking the acknowledgment of the grantor does not invalidate the acknowledgment.
Summary of this case from Ardmore Nat. Bank v. Briggs Machinery & Supply Co.Opinion
NO. 187 WAL (2015)
10-14-2015
Liberty Manor Personal Care Home and William L. Garvin v. Department of Public Welfare; Petition of: The Penn Care Group, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Manor Personal Care Home
Opinion
Appeal from the Commonwealth Court.
Disposition: Denied.