Liberty Glass Co. v. Lemons

2 Citing cases

  1. Henson v. Tulsa Sales Service Co.

    236 P.2d 249 (Okla. 1951)   Cited 1 times

    Its determination of this fact will not be disturbed where reasonably supported by medical testimony. Johnson v. Ben Franklin Refining Co. et al., 194 Okla. 347, 151 P.2d 428; Liberty Glass Co. v. Lemons, 202 Okla. 667, 217 P.2d 516; Oklahoma Gas Electric Co. et al. v. Maloney et al., 184 Okla. 465, 88 P.2d 363."

  2. Borden Co. v. Trusley

    228 P.2d 1018 (Okla. 1951)   Cited 4 times

    Its determination of this fact will not be disturbed where reasonably supported by medical testimony. Johnson v. Ben Franklin Refining Co. et al., 194 Okla. 347, 151 P.2d 428; Liberty Glass Co. v. Lemons, 202 Okla. 667, 217 P.2d 516; Oklahoma Gas Electric Co. et al. v. Maloney et al., 184 Okla. 465, 88 P.2d 363. The evidence is unquestionably sufficient to sustain the finding of the commission as to the extent of disability; and while the evidence is conflicting as to the cause thereof, the evidence of Dr. Moore and respondent is sufficient to sustain the finding of the commission that the disability was caused by the injury sustained on May 5, 1950.