From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liberman v. Zeigen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1939
258 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

December 4, 1939.


Action for money had and received. Defendants moved under rule 107, subdivision 6, of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon. The motion was granted as to the defendant Bessie Zeigen but denied as to the defendant Samuel L. Zeigen, and the latter appeals. In our opinion the issues raised by appellant cannot be determined upon affidavits but must await the trial. Resettled order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Liberman v. Zeigen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1939
258 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Liberman v. Zeigen

Case Details

Full title:SARAH LIBERMAN, Respondent, v. SAMUEL L. ZEIGEN, Appellant; BESSIE ZEIGEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1939

Citations

258 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.

An issue of fact is present which should be resolved at trial. ( Golia v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N Y, 6…