From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Libby v. City of Medford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
May 16, 2017
No. 1:15-cv-00298-CL (D. Or. May. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 1:15-cv-00298-CL

05-16-2017

JASON and DON LIBBY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEDFORD et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

On March 17, 2017, Magistrate Judge Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") recommending this Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment. The F&Ris now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72.1 review de novo those portions of the F&R to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Holder v. Holder, 392 F.3d 1009, 1022 (9th Cir. 2004).

Following a de novo review, I find no error. I ADOPT Judge Clarke's F&R (doc. 67). Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 33 & 42) are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 16th day of May 2017.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Libby v. City of Medford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
May 16, 2017
No. 1:15-cv-00298-CL (D. Or. May. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Libby v. City of Medford

Case Details

Full title:JASON and DON LIBBY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEDFORD et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

No. 1:15-cv-00298-CL (D. Or. May. 16, 2017)

Citing Cases

Moulin v. City of Cent. Point

A grand jury indictment is prima facie evidence of probable cause. Libby v. City of Medford, No.…