From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liang v. Anderson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-1990 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1990 JAM DB PS

06-28-2021

KUANGHUEI LIANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICKEY ANDERSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On March 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 29, 2021 (ECF No. 3) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff Kuanghuei Liang's October 5, 2020 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied;

3. Plaintiffs' October 5, 2020 complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice; and

4. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Liang v. Anderson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-1990 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Liang v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:KUANGHUEI LIANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICKEY ANDERSON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1990 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)