From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LG 52 Doe v. Town of Poughkeepsie

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
21-CV-7859 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-7859 (CS)

12-14-2021

LG 52 DOE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.

For the reasons stated in Kane v. Mt. Pleasant Indep. Sch. Dist., 2021 WL 5112981 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2021), Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's federal claims.

The “traditional ‘values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity'” weigh in favor of declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction where all federal law claims are eliminated before trial. Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hosp., 455 F.3d 118, 122 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)). Having determined that all of the claims over which this Court has original jurisdiction should be dismissed, and having considered the factors set forth in Cohill, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any of Plaintiff's remaining state law causes of action. See Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)). Accordingly, there being no basis for federal jurisdiction, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be REMANDED forthwith to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Dutchess. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion. (ECF No. 8.)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LG 52 Doe v. Town of Poughkeepsie

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
21-CV-7859 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

LG 52 Doe v. Town of Poughkeepsie

Case Details

Full title:LG 52 DOE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

21-CV-7859 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)