Opinion
December, 1920.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hubbs, J., who dissents upon the ground that the records kept did not comply with the terms of the contract and it was error to submit that question to the jury.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
L.F. Dengler Mach. v. Curtiss Aeroplane and MTR
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Summaries of
L.F. Dengler Mach. v. Curtiss Aeroplane and MTR
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for
L.F. Dengler Mach. v. Curtiss Aeroplane and MTR
Case Details
Full title:L.F. DENGLER MACHINE COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. CURTISS AEROPLANE AND…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1920
Citations
194 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)