From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lezcano v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Aug 21, 2024
No. 3D23-0117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2024)

Opinion

3D23-0117

08-21-2024

Neisser F. Lezcano, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County Lower Tribunal No. F18-12613C, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446, 449 (Fla. 1985) ("The law is well established that admission of photographic evidence is within the trial court's discretion and that a court's ruling will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a showing of clear abuse.").


Summaries of

Lezcano v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Aug 21, 2024
No. 3D23-0117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Lezcano v. State

Case Details

Full title:Neisser F. Lezcano, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Aug 21, 2024

Citations

No. 3D23-0117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2024)