From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leytman v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 25, 2021
17-CV-4455 (WFK) (MMH) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2021)

Opinion

17-CV-4455 (WFK) (MMH)

10-25-2021

EDUARD LEYTMAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge:

On July 8, 2021, the Court referred all remaining discovery disputes to Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. See ECF No. 63. On October 8, 2021, Judge Henry filed a Report and Recommendation granting “Plaintiff's request to compel production of the supplemental surveillance videos.” ECF No. 76. Defendant did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation, which were due October 22, 2021. The Court reviews a Report and Recommendation for clear error when no objections have been filed. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F.Supp.2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). The Court finds no such error here. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Henry in its entirety.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Leytman v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 25, 2021
17-CV-4455 (WFK) (MMH) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Leytman v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:EDUARD LEYTMAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 25, 2021

Citations

17-CV-4455 (WFK) (MMH) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2021)