Opinion
No. 101PA14–1.
10-15-2014
Reed Hollander, Raleigh, Christopher A. Mohr, Winston–Salem, for LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc., et al. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC Administrative Office Of The Courts, et al. Hugh Stevens, for The News and Observer Publishing Co., et al. William Jerad Rissler, for Consumer Data Industry Association. Phillip Absolom Harris, Jr., Joseph S. Dowdy, for Associate Professor Ryan Thornburg.
Reed Hollander, Raleigh, Christopher A. Mohr, Winston–Salem, for LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc., et al.Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC Administrative Office Of The Courts, et al.
Hugh Stevens, for The News and Observer Publishing Co., et al.
William Jerad Rissler, for Consumer Data Industry Association.
Phillip Absolom Harris, Jr., Joseph S. Dowdy, for Associate Professor Ryan Thornburg.
Opinion
The motion by The News and Observer Publishing Company, Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc., TimeWarner Entertainment–Advance Newhouse Partnership; DTH Media Corp., and the North Carolina Press Foundation, Inc. to file a brief supporting plaintiff-appellants is allowed.
The motion by The News and Observer Publishing Company, Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc., TimeWarner Entertainment–Advance Newhouse Partnership; DTH Media Corp., and the North Carolina Press Foundation, Inc. to participate in oral argument is allowed as follows:
Pursuant to Rule 30 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, petitioner-appellants have a total of thirty minutes in which to present their oral argument. Petitioner-appellants may, but are not compelled to and are under no duty to, cede a portion of those thirty minutes to The News and Observer Publishing Company, Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc., Time–Warner Entertainment–Advance Newhouse Partnership; DTH Media Corp., and the North Carolina Press Foundation, Inc. However, If petitioner-appellants and amici reach an agreement to share time, they together will have a total of thirty minutes of oral argument.
“Motion Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of October 2014.”