From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lexington 56th Assoc. v. Markley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 5, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 9 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)

Opinion

May 5, 1966

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, FRANK J. BLANGIARDO, J.

Joseph Quittner for appellants.

George Mehlman and Melvin C. Levine for respondents.


On the record, service on the doorman was insufficient to acquire jurisdiction of the tenants pursuant to section 735 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law.

The final judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment directed in favor of tenant and undertenant dismissing the petition, with costs.

Concur — TILZER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and GOLD, JJ.

Final judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Lexington 56th Assoc. v. Markley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 5, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 9 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
Case details for

Lexington 56th Assoc. v. Markley

Case Details

Full title:LEXINGTON 56TH ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents, v. ELVIRA M. MARKLEY et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 5, 1966

Citations

50 Misc. 2d 9 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
269 N.Y.S.2d 563

Citing Cases

Columbus 95th St. LLC v. Fitzmaurice

What makes this case different, is that the service of the Golub Notice by mail on January 28, 2008, resulted…