From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Wise Shops

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 27, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 337 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

June 27, 1957

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, BEATRICE K. CASS, J.

Howard L. Klein for appellant.

Samuel D. Pressman for respondent.


Plaintiff alleged a contract made in January, 1955, for his employment by defendant for a term expiring December, 1955, for which he was to receive $200 a week, and an additional sum of $2,500 as a bonus under certain specific circumstances. This contract was entire and not severable. Accordingly, by limiting the question before the jury solely to whether or not there was a promise by defendant to pay plaintiff a bonus of $2,500, defendant was deprived of the opportunity of having the jury consider whether or not there was sufficient evidence to sustain the entire contract upon which plaintiff's first cause of action is predicated.

Where a charge is wrong in its essential elements and goes on a distinctly wrong theory, reversal and a new trial is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice ( Gales-Rojac Corp. v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 2 Misc.2d 613).

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Wise Shops

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 27, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 337 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Lewis v. Wise Shops

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LEWIS, Respondent, v. WISE SHOPS, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1957

Citations

9 Misc. 2d 337 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
164 N.Y.S.2d 348