From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03387-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03387-CMA-KLM

03-06-2012

SHERRON L. LEWIS JR., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, and DEBRA JOHNSON, in her official and personal capacities, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Docket No. 17; Filed March 5, 2012] (the "Motion"). Despite Plaintiff's pro se status, he is obligated to comply with the same rules of procedure that govern all litigants. Green v. Dorrell, 969 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1992). The Motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Notably, the Court has previously instructed Plaintiff that, if he intends to request permission to file an Amended Complaint, he must do so by motion compliant with the Federal and Local Rules. See [#16].

For further information regarding pro se representation, the Court directs Plaintiff to its website, located at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/RepresentingYourself.aspx.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03387-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Case Details

Full title:SHERRON L. LEWIS JR., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, and DEBRA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03387-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2012)