Opinion
CASE NO. 11-CV-01055 LJO MJS
10-05-2011
Hugh A. McCabe, SBN 131828 David P. Hall, SBN 196891 NEIL, DYMOTT, FRANK, MCFALL & TREXLER Lisa D. MacClugage, Pro Hac Vice Pending TRIPP SCOTT Attorneys for Defendant VISION VALUE LLC dba STANTON OPTICAL
Hugh A. McCabe, SBN 131828
David P. Hall, SBN 196891
NEIL, DYMOTT, FRANK,
MCFALL & TREXLER
Lisa D. MacClugage, Pro Hac Vice Pending
TRIPP SCOTT
Attorneys for Defendant
VISION VALUE LLC dba STANTON OPTICAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT
VISION VALUE, LLC'S TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
Ctrm: 4
Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs Annalisa Lewis, Michelle Catbagan and Defendant Vision Value, LLC dba Stanton Optical, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby submit this Stipulation to Extend the Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint to November 4, 2011.
On September 23, 2011, the parties engaged in Rule 26 conference in preparation of this case and in anticipate of the scheduled status conference. The parties agreed a cost effective way to litigate this case was to engage in informal discovery and exchange of documents. This way the parties could prepare for alternative dispute resolution, either private mediation or through the Court. In light of this agreement, the parties further agree Defendant Vision Value, LLC dba Stanton Optical's responsive pleading should be filed on or before November 4, 2011.
MICHAEL MALK, ESQ. APC
Michael Malk
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ANNALISA LEWIS and
MICHELLE CATBAGAN
NEIL, DYMOTT, FRANK,
MCFALL & TREXLER
A Professional Law Corporation
Hugh A. McCabe
David P. Hall
Attorneys for Defendant
VISION VALUE LLC dba STANTON
OPTICAL
ORDER
In light of the foregoing Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court approves the Stipulation. Defendant Vision Value, LLC dba Stanton Optical shall file its responsive pleading on or before November 4, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE