Opinion
CASE NO. 3:06-CV-200-WKW (WO).
October 10, 2007
ORDER
On September 14, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 9) that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus relief (Doc. #1) is due to be denied because the petitioner failed to present his claim in the state court as required by the state's procedural rules. No objections were filed.
After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that:
1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 9) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED.
3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.