From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1999
730 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-314

Opinion filed April 9, 1999 JANUARY TERM 1999

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, G. Richard Singletary, Judge.

John H. Lewis, Madison, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alfred Washington, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


CORRECTED


Lewis appeals from the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Lewis argues in his motion that the sentence he received (22 years and life probation) exceeds the statutory maximum for his 1990 conviction for second degree murder with a firearm. The trial court did not address the merits of the issue because it stated Lewis had filed a previous rule 3.800(a) motion in 1994, raising this issue, and therefore this motion is successive.

However, the trial court's order fails to include as attachments parts of the court record corroborating the fact that this issue was raised previously by Lewis, in such a manner as to preclude him from raising it in this proceeding. A summary denial of relief must be buttressed by such attachments indicating no relief is warranted. See, e.g., Bunch v. State, 622 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)

Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lewis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1999
730 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Lewis v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN H. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 9, 1999

Citations

730 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

McAllister v. State

The denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion as successive must include an attachment of the prior motion and order.…