From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jan 17, 2012
No. 441, 2011 (Del. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 441, 2011

01-17-2012

ALFRED MAURICE LEWIS, JR., Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court

of the State of Delaware,

in and for New Castle County

Cr. ID 9703011339


Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

This 17th day of January 2012, after careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record below, we find it manifest on the face of the opening brief that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated August 18, 2011. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Lewis' postconviction petition was subject to dismissal because Lewis had been discharged as unimproved in April 2000 from the probationary sentence associated with the conviction for which he sought postconviction relief. As such, Lewis is not "in custody or subject to future custody" as a result of that sentence, and thus has no recourse under Rule 61 to seek postconviction relief.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

Henry duPont Ridgely

Justice

See Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(a) (2011).


Summaries of

Lewis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jan 17, 2012
No. 441, 2011 (Del. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED MAURICE LEWIS, JR., Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

No. 441, 2011 (Del. Jan. 17, 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Lewis

"[A] defendant who has been discharged from probation and is not subject to any future custody on a…

Coleman v. State

Del.Super. Ct.Crim. R. 61(a)(1) (2013) (providing that “[t]his rule governs the procedure on an application…