From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Stankus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 10, 2012
3:10-cv-004 97-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-cv-004 97-ECR-VPC

08-10-2012

ANTHONY LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. A. STANKUS, et al., Defendant(s).

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: EDWARD C. REED , JR. U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE Judicial Assistant: Candace Knab Reporter: NONE APPEARING Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS

On May 30, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (#69) recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#54), filed on December 30, 2011, be granted. No objections were filed.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is well taken and approved. With regard to Plaintiff's Eight Amendment claim, the Court finds that the use of force did not result in the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain or suffering. The extent of Plaintiff's injury was minimal, Plaintiff repeatedly disobeyed orders to remove his hand from the food slot and attempted to grab Stankus' hand and flashlight, the amount of force used was minimal and necessary, and the evidence does not otherwise support an inference of wantonness. Defendants are therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992).

As to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim, the evidence shows that Defendants were not involved in the decision to transfer Plaintiff to another facility. Because "liability under [§] 1983 arises only upon a showing of personal participation by the defendant," Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989), Plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of an essential element of his claim. Defendants are therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiff's First Amendment claim.

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#69) is well taken and is APPROVED and ADOPTED .

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54) is GRANTED .

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By _____________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lewis v. Stankus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 10, 2012
3:10-cv-004 97-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. Stankus

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. A. STANKUS, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA

Date published: Aug 10, 2012

Citations

3:10-cv-004 97-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2012)