From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 31, 2023
No. CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2023)

Opinion

CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS

03-31-2023

Ajelina Louise Roth Lewis, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

HONORABLE JAMES A. SOTO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Ferraro that recommends denying and dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Ferraro's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and adopted.
(2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied.
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 31, 2023
No. CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Lewis v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Ajelina Louise Roth Lewis, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 31, 2023

Citations

No. CV-21-00225-TUC-JAS (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2023)