From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. CIV. S-03-2646 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CIV. S-03-2646 WBS CKD

09-19-2011

CHARLES H. LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT D. RUSSELL; et al., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTER, CROSS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS.

S. Craig Hunter Attorney for Plaintiffs Charles H. Lewis and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased) Gordon & Rees, LLP Kristin Reyna Attorneys for Martin Franchises Inc. aka/dba Martinizing Dry Cleaning


S. Craig Hunter, CA State Bar No. 125247

Attorney At Law

PO Box 13810

San Luis Obispo, CA 93406

Tel: (805) 544-4980

email: craighunterlaw@sbcglobal.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Charles H. Lewis and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased)

STIPULATION FOR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

[FRCP 41(a)(2)]


[ Proposed ]

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Charles H. Lewis, on behalf of himself and for Jane W. Lewis, Deceased ("Lewis"), and defendant Martin Franchises Inc., aka/dba Martinizing Dry Cleaning ("Martin"), through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to an order of the above-entitled Court dismissing the above-entitled action, as against Martin only, with prejudice, according to the terms of a Mutual Release of Claims (the "Release"), having an "Effective Date" of September 13, 2011, entered into by and between Lewis and Martin.

S. Craig Hunter

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Charles H. Lewis and

Jane W. Lewis (Deceased)

Gordon & Rees, LLP

By: Kristin Reyna

Attorneys for Martin Franchises Inc.

aka/dba Martinizing Dry Cleaning

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court, having reviewed and considered the stipulation set forth above, and good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed, as against defendant Martin Franchises Inc., aka/dba Martinizing Dry Cleaning only, with prejudice.

IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal is expressly conditioned upon the terms and conditions of that certain Mutual Release of Claims entered into by and between Lewis and Martin having an Effective Date of September 13, 2011 (the "Release").

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for the sole purpose of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of the Release.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that each of the parties hereto shall bear its own costs, including attorney's fees, as provided in the Release.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lewis v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. CIV. S-03-2646 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Lewis v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT D. RUSSELL; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. CIV. S-03-2646 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)