From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Runnels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-04-1136 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1136 JAM EFB P

09-27-2011

MICHAEL ANTHONY LEWIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in propria persona with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated January 26, 2005, this matter was administratively stayed to allow petitioner the opportunity to exhaust certain claims in state court. By order filed May 31, 2005, petitioner was directed to inform the court when he had exhausted his state court remedies. Petitioner has not corresponded with the court since that time. In light of the above, petitioner will be granted thirty days from the date of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 110.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days from this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lewis v. Runnels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-04-1136 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Lewis v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANTHONY LEWIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1136 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)