From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1971
37 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

July 6, 1971


In an action for divorce based on a separation agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 7, 1970, which, upon defendant's motion, directed plaintiff to pay $50 per week alimony pendente lite and $500 as a counsel fee to defendant's attorneys. Order reversed, without costs, motion denied as to temporary alimony and motion as to a counsel fee referred to the trial court. At the time of the execution of the separation agreement on November 10, 1967, defendant was a licensed practical nurse earning in excess of $6,000 per year. Accordingly, the separation agreement made no provision for her support. Defendant thereafter left her job and returned to college to seek a Bachelor of Science degree in nursing. We are of the opinion that in view of the circumstances of the parties the award of alimony pendente lite was an abuse of discretion. Plaintiff should not be compelled to support defendant, as she voluntarily left her well-paying position to seek a college degree and is therefore capable of being "self supporting" within the meaning of section 236 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law. Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1971
37 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Lewis v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. LEWIS, Appellant, v. SHIRLEY L. LEWIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1971

Citations

37 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Lois R. v. Richard R.

Certainly a petitioner has an obligation to secure gainful employment if she can. (Kay v Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632,…

Conner v. Conner

Brownstein v Brownstein, supra; Winkler v Winkler, 25 Misc.2d 938, affd 13 A.D.2d 924, affd 11 N.Y.2d 693;…