Opinion
2:22-cv-00423 KJM DB PS
07-11-2023
YOLANDA LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT L. JONES, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On March 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The time for filling objections has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[Determinations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2023 (ECF No. 11) are adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m).