From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION SECTION P
Feb 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-1732 (W.D. La. Feb. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-1732

02-28-2012

CHAUNCEY LEWIS v. OFFICER MATTHEW HILL, ET AL.


JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record, and consistent with this Court's prior practice,

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve on Defendant Matthew Hill, through the U.S. Marshal, two (2) completed summons forms, one (1) USM-285 form, and a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8], this Judgment, the Complaint [Doc. No. 1], and Plaintiff's Objection [Doc. No. 9].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action- insofar as it seeks monetary damages for wrongful arrest, imprisonment and prosecution - be STAYED under the following conditions:

a. Within thirty (30) days of the date the state court criminal proceedings against Plaintiff have concluded, the parties must file a status report with the Clerk of Court;
b. If, after conclusion of the state court criminal proceedings, the stay is lifted and the Court finds Plaintiff's claims would impugn the validity of his conviction, the action will be dismissed under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); if no such finding is made, the action will proceed at that time, absent some other bar to suit. See Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 393-94 (2007);
c. In light of the stay, Plaintiff should not file any more documents in
this action until the state court proceedings have concluded; and
d. Defendant shall not be required to answer during the pendency of the stay, and Plaintiff may not seek a default judgment or conduct any discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action - insofar as Plaintiff seeks the dismissal of the pending criminal charges and his immediate release from custody - be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 28 day of Februrary, 2012

__________________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lewis v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION SECTION P
Feb 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-1732 (W.D. La. Feb. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:CHAUNCEY LEWIS v. OFFICER MATTHEW HILL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-1732 (W.D. La. Feb. 28, 2012)