From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Dec 10, 2021
2:20-cv-00668-CL ORDER (D. Or. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00668-CL ORDER

12-10-2021

QUINTON LEWIS, Petitioner, v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 34), and the matter is now before this Court on Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 34) is adopted in full. The First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 17) is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Dec 10, 2021
2:20-cv-00668-CL ORDER (D. Or. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Lewis v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:QUINTON LEWIS, Petitioner, v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00668-CL ORDER (D. Or. Dec. 10, 2021)