From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Burke

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jan 12, 1972
277 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1972)

Opinion

No. 172S5.

Filed January 12, 1972.

1. PROCEDURE — T.R. 53.1 (A). — The Indiana Supreme Court has determined that affirmative action by counsel or the clerk is a prerequisite to the operation of T.R. 53.1 (A). p. 598.

2. PROCEDURE — T.R. 53.1 (A) — Petitioner. — Defendant's motion to dismiss should have been ruled upon within thirty days from submission to the trial court, and the trial judge was subject to removal on and after the date thirty days from which the motion to dismiss was fully briefed and taken under advisement by the court. However, no affirmative action having been taken as prescribed in the cases of Jolly v. Modisett and Raisor v. Kelly, the jurisdiction of the trial judge continued and was operative on the date of his ruling, which was five months following the date upon which the motion was briefed and taken under advisement. p. 598.

This cause is before the Supreme Court upon praecipe of defendant (petitioner) and resultant notice from the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court advising of the withdrawal of submission and requesting the Supreme Court to appoint a special judge because of undue delay in ruling upon Defendant's motion to dismiss.

Withdrawal of submission is hereby set aside and jurisdiction of trial judge is continued.

Hartell F. Denmure, of Aurora, Robert S. Justice, of Logansport, for plaintiff.

Chester R. Callis, of Vevay, Frank E. Spencer, of Indianapolis, for Executor defendant.

Mrs. Gretchen H. Cole, of Vevay, John A. Farr, of Anderson, for Intervener heirs.


— This cause is before us upon praecipe of Defendant (Petitioner) and the resultant notice from the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court advising of the withdrawal of submission and requesting us to appoint a special judge by reason of the undue delay of the trial judge in ruling upon Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; and it is now so docketed for determination under Trial Rule 53.2 (A).

Said notice and the praecipe therefor disclose that the petitioner's motion to dismiss was filed and argued on December 1, 1970, and fully briefed and taken under advisement on January 29, 1971. It is further disclosed that said judge held said matter under advisement until June 30, 1971, upon which day said motion was overruled. Petitioner's praecipe was filed with the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court on November 5, 1971.

We have recently passed upon similar questions arising under T.R. 53.1 (A) and determined that affirmative action by counsel or the Clerk is a prerequisite to the operation 1. of said rule. Jolly v. Modisett (1971), 257 Ind. 426, 275 N.E.2d 780; Raisor v. Kelly (1971), Ind., 275 N.E.2d 542. Petitioner's motion should have been ruled upon within thirty days from submission, and the trial judge was subject to removal on and after February 29, 1971. However, 2. no affirmative action having been taken as prescribed in Jolly v. Moisett, supra, and Raisor v. Kelly, supra, the jurisdiction of the trial judge continued and was operative on the date of his ruling.

Accordingly, the withdrawal of submission is hereby set aside, and the jurisdiction of the trial judge is continued.

Arterburn, C.J., and Givan and Hunter, JJ., concur; DeBruler, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Burke

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jan 12, 1972
277 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1972)
Case details for

Lewis v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE C. LEWIS v . MYERS BURKE, EXECUTOR OF ESTATE OF COPELAND

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Jan 12, 1972

Citations

277 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1972)
277 N.E.2d 161

Citing Cases

Weber v. Electrostatic Engineering, Inc.

" (Original emphasis.)See also, Lewis v. Burke, Extr., (1972) 257 Ind. 597, 277 N.E.2d 161; Leventhal Auto…

Unishops, Inc. et al. v. May's Family Centers, Inc.

Such provisions are not new in Indiana law, although prior decisions stressed the necessity that the trial…