From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Boeing Co.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Nov 14, 2024
C. A. 2:22-cv-3403 DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. 2:22-cv-3403 DCN

11-14-2024

Lance Lowell Lewis, Plaintiff, v. The Boeing Company, Defendant.


ORDER

David C. Norton, United States District Judge

The above-referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and this case be dismissed in its entirety.

This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984),,cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation on July 29, 2024. On August 12, 2024, defendant filed a reply to those objections.

In Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985), the court held "that a pro se litigant must receive fair notification of the consequences of failure to object to a magistrate judge's report before such a procedural default will result in waiver of the right to appeal. The notice must be 'sufficiently understandable to one in appellant's circumstances fairly to appraise him of what is required.'" Id. at 846. Plaintiff was advised in a clear manner that his objections had to be filed within ten (10) days, and he received notice of the consequences at the appellate level of his failure to object to the magistrate judge's report.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED and incorporated into this order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified that any right to appeal this Order is governed by Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Boeing Co.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Nov 14, 2024
C. A. 2:22-cv-3403 DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Lewis v. Boeing Co.

Case Details

Full title:Lance Lowell Lewis, Plaintiff, v. The Boeing Company, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division

Date published: Nov 14, 2024

Citations

C. A. 2:22-cv-3403 DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2024)