From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Ayers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2011
No. CIV S-02-0013 FCD GGH DP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0013 FCD GGH DP.

April 19, 2011


DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER


The parties shall, within twenty-one days of the filed date of this order, file concise simultaneous briefs concerning whetherCullen v. Pinholster, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1388 (2011) invalidates this court's order for an evidentiary hearing, i.e., whether all issues on which an evidentiary hearing was granted were 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) issues which should be reviewed solely on the factual record set forth in state court either during trial, direct review, or in state habeas proceedings. The parties shall also brief whether respondent is bound by Cullen or whether Cullen only applies to potential grants of a petition as opposed to potential denials. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d): "an application for a writ of habeas corpus . . . shall not be granted with respect to any claim . . ." If respondent argues that respondent is not bound by Cullen, respondent shall indicate whether respondent desires an evidentiary hearing, and on what issues.

If respondent requests an evidentiary hearing on any issue, and the court determines that respondent is entitled to such a hearing, the court shall afford petitioner the opportunity to fully factually respond at such a hearing.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Ayers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2011
No. CIV S-02-0013 FCD GGH DP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Lewis v. Ayers

Case Details

Full title:MILTON OTIS LEWIS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT AYERS, Warden Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-02-0013 FCD GGH DP (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2011)