From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Andrews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-0305 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-0305

01-31-2019

MICHAEL RAY LEWIS, (a/k/a LEWIS MICHAEL RAY) Plaintiff, v. D. ANDREWS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Michael Ray Lewis, a Texas state inmate (TDCJ #746714), has filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Lewis alleges that several employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice have used forged documents, in cooperation with a law firm, to keep Lewis in prison. He seeks $25 million in damages.

Lewis is representing himself and presumably moves for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. After reviewing the pleadings and Lewis's litigation history, the court denies him leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and dismisses this case. The reasons are explained below.

Lewis's complaint is governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which was enacted, in part, to prevent prisoners from abusing the privilege of proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee. Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Under the "three-strikes" rule established by the PLRA, a prisoner is not allowed to bring a civil action without prepayment of the filing fee in federal court if, while incarcerated, three or more of his civil actions or appeals were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless he is in "imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 385. To fit within the exception, a prisoner must demonstrate that imminent danger of serious physical injury exists at the time he seeks to file his complaint. Banos v. O'Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998). The threat of harm must be "real and proximate." Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330-31 (7th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted).

Lewis is a "three strikes" inmate who is barred under § 1915(g) from proceeding without prepaying the filing fee. See, e.g., Lewis v. Treece, Civil No. H-18-3435 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2018) (dismissing case with prejudice as frivolous and malicious); Michael v. Treece, Civil No. H-18-2610 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2018) (dismissing case with prejudice as malicious); Ray v. Treece, Civil No. H-16-3292 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2016) (dismissing case with prejudice for failure to state a claim). Lewis's complaint does not demonstrate that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. He may not proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

Lewis's implied motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee is denied. The lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice under § 1915(g). Lewis may move to reinstate this case upon payment of the full $400.00 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this dismissal.

The Clerk will provide a copy of this order to the Manager of the Three-Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.

SIGNED on January 31, 2019, at Houston, Texas.

/s/_________

Lee H. Rosenthal

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lewis v. Andrews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-0305 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Lewis v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RAY LEWIS, (a/k/a LEWIS MICHAEL RAY) Plaintiff, v. D. ANDREWS, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-0305 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2019)