From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LEWIN v. BROWN DRIVE IT YOURSELF CORP

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 6, 1932
155 Misc. 225 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

Opinion

May 6, 1932.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, County of New York.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel, for the appellant.

Melvin S. Brotman, for the respondent.


After the litigation had terminated and the proceeds received for the benefit of the infant had been deposited with the city chamberlain the court had no power to direct payment thereof to the guardian ad litem. Nor do we find any provision of law dispensing with the giving of the bond required by rule 41 of the Rules of Civil Practice under the circumstances which the record discloses.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, LEVY, CALLAHAN and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Summaries of

LEWIN v. BROWN DRIVE IT YOURSELF CORP

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 6, 1932
155 Misc. 225 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
Case details for

LEWIN v. BROWN DRIVE IT YOURSELF CORP

Case Details

Full title:MILTON LEWIN, an Infant, by SAMUEL LEWIN, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 6, 1932

Citations

155 Misc. 225 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
280 N.Y.S. 912

Citing Cases

Nicolosi v. Olshansky

The two courts mentioned in the rule quoted are the only ones having jurisdiction of the distribution of…