From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levy v. Rague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

December, 1929.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.


Upon agreed statement of facts, judgment unanimously directed for defendant, without costs. The Surrogate's Court of the county of Richmond failed to acquire jurisdiction of all parties interested in the estate of Carrie Melville, deceased, and, therefore, the decree of the court declaring the 13th paragraph of the will invalid, illegal and void, and directing its elimination from the will, does not affect the rights of the contingent remaindermen, who, concededly, were not parties to the proceeding brought for the construction of the will of Carrie Melville pursuant to the provisions of section 145 of the Surrogate's Court Act. The plaintiffs, therefore, cannot convey a good and marketable title. In this decision we do not review the decree of the learned surrogate of Richmond county, under which the 13th paragraph of the will was excised, as it is not before us and, therefore, do not pass upon the validity or invalidity of that clause.


Summaries of

Levy v. Rague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Levy v. Rague

Case Details

Full title:ANNA LEVY and MILDRED FESSLER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES RAGUE, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1929

Citations

228 App. Div. 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)