From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levy v. Cusumano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 16, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an inquest to determine the amount of damages.

As a general rule, a default will be vacated and a late answer will be permitted and deemed timely served where a defendant can show that there is some merit to his or her defense and that there is some reasonable excuse for the default (see, McFadden v Battaglia, 159 A.D.2d 700; Klenk v. Kent, 103 A.D.2d 1002). Here, the defendants Anthony and Carol Pariti have not only failed to show that they had a meritorious defense, but they have also failed to offer any explanation for their more than eight-month delay in serving an answer. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Levy v. Cusumano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Levy v. Cusumano

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. LEVY et al., Appellants, v. JOHN CUSUMANO et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 201

Citing Cases

Widelec v. Silberstein

His vehicle struck a parked vehicle, which then struck Widelec's vehicle parked in front of it. According to…

Widelec v. Silberstein

According to this version of the accident, these defendants may bear little, if any, responsibility for…