From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levy v. 7-Eleven Stores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 7, 2013
3:13-CV-2177-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2013)

Summary

alleging a female employee at defendant's Los Angeles store had "sexually harassed, bullied and falsely imprisoned" plaintiff by calling her "Sweetheart" and that "the trauma caused her to sustain neck injuries"; that an employee at defendant's store in Sacramento "defamed, bullied and falsely imprisoned her in March 2013"; that "sexual harassment and false imprisonment are bullying," and "some women have bullied [plaintiff] all her life for not aging"; and "since then she began to promote the economy by suing corporations for acts of discrimination"

Summary of this case from Levy v. Macy's, Inc.

Opinion

3:13-CV-2177-M-BK

08-07-2013

AMANDA U. LEVY, Plaintiff, v. 7-ELEVEN STORES, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and that Plaintiff is BARRED from filing this action in this Court until the $250 sanction imposed in No. 3:06-CV-0612-L is paid in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any future action filed in this Court.

The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

____________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Levy v. 7-Eleven Stores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 7, 2013
3:13-CV-2177-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2013)

alleging a female employee at defendant's Los Angeles store had "sexually harassed, bullied and falsely imprisoned" plaintiff by calling her "Sweetheart" and that "the trauma caused her to sustain neck injuries"; that an employee at defendant's store in Sacramento "defamed, bullied and falsely imprisoned her in March 2013"; that "sexual harassment and false imprisonment are bullying," and "some women have bullied [plaintiff] all her life for not aging"; and "since then she began to promote the economy by suing corporations for acts of discrimination"

Summary of this case from Levy v. Macy's, Inc.

alleging a female employee at defendant's Los Angeles store had "sexually harassed, bullied and falsely imprisoned" plaintiff by calling her "Sweetheart" and that "the trauma caused her to sustain neck injuries"; that an employee at defendant's store in Sacramento "defamed, bullied and falsely imprisoned her in March 2013"; that "sexual harassment and false imprisonment are bullying," and "some women have bullied [plaintiff] all her life for not aging"; and "since then she began to promote the economy by suing corporations for acts of discrimination"

Summary of this case from Levy v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.

alleging a female employee at defendant's Los Angeles store had "sexually harassed, bullied and falsely imprisoned" plaintiff by calling her "Sweetheart" and that "the trauma caused her to sustain neck injuries"; that an employee at defendant's store in Sacramento "defamed, bullied and falsely imprisoned her in March 2013"; that "sexual harassment and false imprisonment are bullying," and "some women have bullied [plaintiff] all her life for not aging"; and "since then she began to promote the economy by suing corporations for acts of discrimination"

Summary of this case from Levy v. Macy's, Inc.
Case details for

Levy v. 7-Eleven Stores

Case Details

Full title:AMANDA U. LEVY, Plaintiff, v. 7-ELEVEN STORES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 7, 2013

Citations

3:13-CV-2177-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2013)

Citing Cases

Levy v. Macy's, Inc.

Landt v. Farley, No. 4:12CV0740, 2012 WL 4473209, at *1, n.2 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 26, 2012) (citation omitted).…

Levy v. Macy's, Inc.

Landt v. Farley, No. 4:112CV0740, 2012 WL 4473209, at *1, n.2 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 26, 2012) (citation omitted).…