From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levron v. Dupre

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 21, 1975
316 So. 2d 395 (La. 1975)

Opinion

No. 56030.

May 21, 1975.

ON CERTIORARI OR WRIT OF REVIEW TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF LAFOURCHE.


MOTION

On joint motion of David Dupre, The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, South Central Bell Telephone Company, and Patrick E. Berniard, appearing herein through respective undersigned counsel, and on suggesting to this Honorable Court that a Third Party Demand was filed by David Dupre and The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company against Patrick E. Berniard and South Central Bell Telephone Company, and a certiorari or writ of review was granted by this Honorable Court on April 18th, 1975, 310 So.2d 838, and on suggesting to this Honorable Court that the Third Party Demand against Patrick E. Berniard and South Central Bell Telephone Company has been compromised and settled, and movers desire that the writs issued by this Honorable Court be recalled and vacated and that the Third Party Demand of David Dupre and The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company be dismissed.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the writ of certiorari or writ of review issued by this Honorable Court on April 18th, 1975, be recalled and vacated and that the Third Party Demand of David Dupre and The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company be dismissed with prejudice.

DAVID DUPRE and THE MILLERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

BY: (s) Edward P. Lobman

PATRICK E. BERNIARD and SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY BY: (s) Donald L. Peltier


Summaries of

Levron v. Dupre

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 21, 1975
316 So. 2d 395 (La. 1975)
Case details for

Levron v. Dupre

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN LEVRON, JR. v. DAVID DUPRE AND THE MILLERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 21, 1975

Citations

316 So. 2d 395 (La. 1975)

Citing Cases

Howell v. New Orleans Public Service

d Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 330 So.2d 619 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1976); Breckenridge v. Parker, 310 So.2d 124…