holding that a pro se plaintiff's letter that contained "no claim sufficient to satisfy Rule 8" did not "constitute[] a pleading sufficient to toll the statute of limitations"
Summary of this case from Harte v. Ocwen Fin. Corp.No. 96-7757.
February 12, 1997.
Appeal from the S.D.N.Y., 932 F.Supp. 508.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that a pro se plaintiff's letter that contained "no claim sufficient to satisfy Rule 8" did not "constitute[] a pleading sufficient to toll the statute of limitations"
Summary of this case from Harte v. Ocwen Fin. Corp.holding that initiation of separate litigation does not confer upon class members a right to notice above and beyond that due other class members
Summary of this case from Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.affirming the district court's sua sponte dismissal pursuant to the Heck bar
Summary of this case from Garcia-Melendez v. Gonzalezaffirming denial of a motion for a late opt-out where, "despite the lack of mailed notice, the [movant's] attorney knew of the class action and settlement, and could have followed up on it"
Summary of this case from In re King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.affirming dismissal of bankruptcy appeal based upon untimely notice of appeal and quoting COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY for the proposition that " multitude of cases hold that unless an appeal is timely taken, the reviewing court lacks jurisdiction to hear it"
Summary of this case from In re Bushnellreviewing alleged "procedural errors" de novo because court is determining whether conduct satisfies the legal standard of due process
Summary of this case from Morse v. Rescap Borrower Claims TrustFull title:Levitin v. Homburger
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Feb 12, 1997
I find Burns persuasive in light of its consistency with the language of the rule, see Rule 23(c)(2) (" best…
Smith v. Wayne Weinberger, P.C."In essence, [Smith] is asking me to review the judgment rendered in the [foreclosure] proceeding,…