From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levine v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1991
173 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 23, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.).


Defendants' counsel, in ordering his clients not to respond during depositions to questioning in areas which counsel unilaterally deemed to be irrelevant, and in continually objecting to matters other than form, contrary to the stipulation of the parties, effectively thwarted plaintiffs' efforts to depose defendants. Further, defendants have not advanced any legitimate basis for their failure to turn over documents requested during such depositions. Defendants have not established that the documents are unavailable or otherwise beyond their possession or control.

Defendants' remaining arguments are equally devoid of merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Levine v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1991
173 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Levine v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:ERIC LEVINE et al., Respondents, v. DAVID GOLDSTEIN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 23, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
569 N.Y.S.2d 715

Citing Cases

Oi Tai Chan v. Society of Shaolin Temple, Inc.

"A complete reading of the depositions reveals that defense counsel's attitude toward plaintiffs counsel was…

Principe v. Assay Partners

Authority clearly indicates that part 130 sanctions may be used to address abuses in the discovery process of…