From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levine v. Ceppos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the orders are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

It is a well settled rule that if a child is supported by a third person who acted without any claim or expectation of reimbursement, the parent's support obligation is deemed satisfied and no action to recover for the support will lie (see, Swanton v Curley, 273 N.Y. 325; Silkworth v Silkworth, 255 App. Div. 226).

Here, the plaintiff's own proof established that he paid the childrens' costs and tuition voluntarily and without any expectation of reimbursement. The plaintiff's claim cannot be based on an expectation arising out of the judgment of divorce insofar as he was not a party to that action and, therefore, he does not have standing to enforce the terms of that judgment. Moreover, even if the plaintiff's standing were construed to arise out of the divorce judgment, here the mother (the plaintiff's wife) executed a Stipulation and Release in favor of the defendant (her former husband), in consideration of $15,000, in full and "final settlement" of any and all claims "including child support". Accordingly, any claim by the plaintiff to recover for support or tuition is precluded.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court has the inherent power to search the record and award summary judgment to a nonmoving party (Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 N.Y.2d 106; see also, N Y Const, art VI, §§ 4, 7).

We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Levine v. Ceppos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Levine v. Ceppos

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN LEVINE, Appellant, v. NEAL CEPPOS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 86

Citing Cases

Matter of Samuelson v. Samuelson

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.). Where a child receives adequate support, even…