From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aqua Dynamics Sys.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 6, 2022
No. 2021-1871 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1871

01-06-2022

LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Plaintiff-Appellee v. AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Robert A. McFarlane, Hanson Bridgett LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Rosanna Gan, Josephine Kendra Petrick, Gary A. Watt. James Lee Michaels, Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Eric C. Lauritsen.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:15-cv-04718-WHO, Judge William H. Orrick, III.

Robert A. McFarlane, Hanson Bridgett LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Rosanna Gan, Josephine Kendra Petrick, Gary A. Watt.

James Lee Michaels, Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Eric C. Lauritsen.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM

(Moore, Chief Judge, Plager and O'Malley, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aqua Dynamics Sys.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 6, 2022
No. 2021-1871 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aqua Dynamics Sys.

Case Details

Full title:LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Plaintiff-Appellee v. AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-1871 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 6, 2022)