Opinion
Civil Action No. 3:17CV23
12-15-2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Larry Leverett, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ("§ 2241 Petition," ECF No. 1) claiming the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") had improperly calculated his sentence. On November 28, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation wherein he recommended denying Leverett's § 2241 Petition because the BOP has properly calculated Leverett's sentence pursuant to its granted authority. (ECF No. 15.) The Court advised Leverett that he could file objections within fourteen (14) days after the entry of the Report and Recommendation. Leverett has not responded.
"The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court." Estrada v. Witkowski, 816 F. Supp. 408, 410 (D.S.C. 1993) (citing Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976)). This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). "The filing of objections to a magistrate's report enables the district judge to focus attention on those issues—factual and legal—that are at the heart of the parties' dispute." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985). In the absence of a specific written objection, this Court may adopt a magistrate judge's recommendation without conducting a de novo review. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 316 (4th Cir. 2005).
There being no objections, and the Court having determined that the Report and Recommendation is correct on its merits, the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) will be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) will be GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) will be DISMISSED as moot. Leverett's § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 1) will be DENIED. Leverett's claims and the action will be DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED.
An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/_________
John A. Gibney, Jr.
United States District Judge Date: 12/15/17
Richmond, Virginia