Levenick v. Tennis

Full title: RAYMOND LEVENICK, Petitioner, v. FRANKLIN TENNIS, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 24, 2007

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3525 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3525.

April 24, 2007

ORDER

EDMUND LUDWIG, Senior District Judge

AND NOW this 24th day of April, 2007, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;

2. Objections are over-ruled;.

3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

4. A certificate of appealablity SHALL NOT issue in that the Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or demonstrated that a reasonable jurist would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) and

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.