Opinion
No C-03-1390 VRW.
August 5, 2004
ORDER
On July 16, 2004, Magistrate Judge James issued an order compelling plaintiffs to respond to defendants' interrogatories seeking plaintiffs' wages from other employment and tip income earned during 1999-2003. Doc # 265. On July 26, 2004, plaintiffs filed their objections to the July 16 order. Doc # 266. The court has reviewed plaintiffs' objections and attached exhibits and does not believe further briefing or a hearing is necessary. See Civ LR 72-2. Magistrate Judge James' order is not clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Osband v Woodford, 290 F3d 1036, 1041 (9th Cir 2002). Accordingly, plaintiffs' objections (Doc # 266) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.