From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leung v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 22, 2018
No. 17-CV-2703-LTS-AJP (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-CV-2703-LTS-AJP

01-22-2018

UNA ANGIE LEUNG, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Pro Se Plaintiff Una Angie Leung ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny her application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") and Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). ("Complaint," Docket Entry No. 2.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), the Commissioner subsequently moved for judgment on the pleadings. (Docket Entry No. 15.) On November 30, 2017, Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck issued a Report and Recommendation (the "Report," Docket Entry No. 17) recommending that the Defendant's motion be granted and that the Complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report have been filed by either party.

When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1) (C) (LexisNexis 2016). "To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Peck's thorough and well-reasoned Report, to which no objection has been made, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 15.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

January 22, 2018

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge Copy mailed to:
Una Angie Leung
35 Montgomery Street
Apartment 3E
New York, NY 10002


Summaries of

Leung v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 22, 2018
No. 17-CV-2703-LTS-AJP (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Leung v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:UNA ANGIE LEUNG, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 22, 2018

Citations

No. 17-CV-2703-LTS-AJP (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2018)